FAQ

Frequently asked questions about the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest’s Sustainable Roads analysis. Information provided by Forest Service staff.

WHY IS THE FOREST SERVICE DOING THIS ANALYSIS?

The U.S. Forest Service is directed to implement the Travel Management Rule by Sept. 30, 2015, requiring each national forest and grassland to identify the sustainable road system needed for safe and efficient travel and for the protection, management and use of national forest  lands. The rule requires each national forest to identify roads that are no longer needed to meet resource management objectives and should be scheduled for decommissioning or considered for other uses. The Forest Service intends to identify and maintain an appropriately-sized and environmentally-sustainable road system that provides access for recreation and resource protection, management and restoration.

SUSTAINABLE ROADS ANALYSIS. WHAT IS IT?

As defined in regulations at 36 CFR part 212.5, it is the minimum road system needed to:

  • Meet resource and other management objectives as adopted in land and resource management plans.
  • Meet statutory and regulatory requirements.
  • Reflect long-term funding expectations.
  • Ensure the identified system minimizes adverse environmental impacts associated with road construction, reconstruction, decommissioning and maintenance.

WILL DECISIONS BE MADE?

The analysis serves as the basis for developing proposed actions, but will not result in decisions.  The travel analysis does not trigger the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Decisions on road closures or changes must be done under NEPA.

WILL THE PUBLIC GET A CHANCE TO GIVE INPUT?

The Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest conducted public engagement meetings to discover what roads and destinations people value most and why.  Public meetings invovled stakeholders and interested citizens, and special interest groups in a continuing dialogue regarding forest roads. The public will have subsequent opportunities to respond through the NEPA process to future project actions that may be recommended.  District rangers will meet with Tribes in a government-to-government capacity.

WHO CONDUCTS THE PROCESS AND HOW WILL THEY DO IT?

The Sustainable Roads Analysis used an interdisciplinary, science-based process to evaluate individual segments of the road system.  This process took into account public issues, forest plan allocations and management constraints.

Road segments were rated as low, medium or high based on evaluation criteria under categories of resource concerns and access needs.  Forest specialists considered resource concerns for aquatics, wildlife, cultural and heritage areas, and invasive plant species; access needs for vegetation management, recreation, cultural and heritage areas, special uses, administrative uses, and joint ownership.

WILL ROADS BE CLOSED?

This is strictly an analysis and not a decision-making process.  However, the strategies developed through this process will reduce the overall size of the road system.  We will include full public involvement through the National Environmental Policy Act as we move forward to upgrade roads, close roads, decommission them or convert them to trails.

WHAT ABOUT NATURAL, CULTURAL AND HERITAGE RESOURCES?

This process identifies the benefits and risks associated with retaining, decommissioning or closing roads.  The process will not make those decisions, but will inform future decisions and actions regarding the road network.

WILL MOTORIZED TRAILS BE INCLUDED?

Yes.  The travel analysis process, while emphasizing roads, must consider the entire travel network, including motorized trails, as part of the benefits and risks analysis, route density calculations, connections to recreation use, and other similar considerations in order to be comprehensive.

HOW ARE COST-SHARE ROADS GOING TO BE ADDRESSED?

Cost-share roads that are under national forest  jurisdiction will be included as part of the analysis.  However, recommendations associated with the management of these roads will only be made in agreement with the land owners.

WILL THIS AFFECT FIREFIGHTER RESPONSE TIME?

More roads mean greater access for firefighters and equipment.  However, firefighters reach fires through a variety of methods, including hiking, landing in a helicopter, or jumping or rappelling from aircraft. Fewer roads may mean greater use of aircraft and hiking for initial attack, and somewhat longer response times.

WHAT ABOUT STATE AND COUNTY ROADS ON NATIONAL FOREST LANDS?

While the analysis process will consider connections to private, county or state roads, recommendations will only apply to Forest Service roads.

3 responses to “FAQ

  1. Good work..I totally support the closure of roads..The cost and enviromental impact of keeping these open has been too high for too long..

  2. I do not support road closure. These roads could be used for wilderness fire fighting activities, Search and Rescue and of course recreation.

  3. I am against closing roads. Why doesn’t the FS think ‘out of the box’ and use some creativity to let users fund these roads? I love riding my street-legal dual sport motorcycle on the forest roads… but I can’t take my son with me on his OHV motorcycle. Why not? There is no logical reason, only a policy reason. Similarly, I can’t ride my utility ATV on these forest roads… not for reasons of safety but for reasons of policy. The FS folks across the Cascades have done a good job of working with different types of users. Just look at Conconully and the Okanogan, where OHV dirt bike and ATV users can ride on many of the forest roads… and what that has done to the economy in the Okanogan. Why can’t Darrington become the ‘Conconully’ of western Washington, and replace the economic benefits that have been lost due to reduced logging and forestry with tourism dollars from ATV and dirt bike riders from Olympia, Tacoma, Seattle, and Everett? Note that these user communities are also willing to volunteer to help clear the roads each spring, at no cost to the Forest Service, and to help haul in materials and supplies for maintaining any type of trail… hiking, equestrian, or motorized. In short, there is no cost or environmental impact from existing roads, so why not think creatively and let users benefit from, and support, these existing roads for a variety of uses?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s